Imagine that your culture supported an environment where individuals, teams and the organization as a whole consistently achieved what they set out to achieve. Imagine if you yourself could have that confidence.
Some years ago, wanting to help clients build a performance culture, I studied the work of David McClelland, Harvard professor of psychology and tutor of Daniel Goleman, researched extensively the achievement motivation, the make up of those people who were driven by the satisfaction of achievement.
What I found surprised me, because it was different from much of what I saw talked about under the banner of ‘performance culture’. For a start the word ‘performance’ conjures up the image of performing for someone else, of putting on a show, whereas achievement is much more centred on the satisfaction of the individual concerned. The ‘I did it’ feeling that we all feel when we accomplish something we set out to achieve. I like that, I think it is more grounded and sustainable, and protected from some of the wild excesses of behavior and performance which has led to the world’s current financial problems.
Performance needs a subjective adjective to describe it – good performance, bad performance. Achievement stands on its own two feet, based on the goal set. That appealed too.
But fundamentally I was drawn to McClelland’s conclusions about the achievement motivation, and I have since built many programs which help organizations build these into their culture plans and leadership development strategies. To simplify, there are five:
1. The goal is totally owned by the individual. Targets imposed without negotiation and commitment, directions and commands issued by email, a lack of engagement – these put their very achievement at risk. They do not draw out the natural achievement motivation which every human being has when they feel totally committed to achieve a goal. (Think of the child continually striving to take each new step of physical development).
2. Risk mastery. If satisfaction is reached when the goal is achieved, then identifying and overcoming everything which could stand in the way of this achievement becomes of paramount importance. In an achievement culture a lot of time is dedicated to the anticipation of risk, and to building plans to mitigate against risk. When this achievement gene is missing in the culture, a lot is left to luck, chance, hope and magic.
3.Taking responsibility for solutions in the face of challenges. The achievement culture does not support blame, justification, a victim mindset, denial and defensiveness. In short, there is always a drive to see oneself as a part of the situation, and therefore a part of its solution. This attitude leads to continuous innovation, improvement and problem solving.
4. Keeping score. An organization or individual who is motivated by achievement is going to want to have really good ways of knowing if that is happening. Achievemenet cultures use metrics as a mechanism to motivate and engage. As well as measuring the outcome, they become a strategy for actually increasing the likelihood of achieving that outcome.
5. Intrinsic motivation. The achievement motivation is a love of achievement, the thrill of hitting that target. This is different from the extrinsic motivation of financial reward, pleasing others, recognition, which I see as more linked to ‘performance’. When there is too much emphasis on these, and not enough on how to create an environment where people can repeated experience the thrill of success in its own right, behaviors can become dysfunctional.
As you can see, some of these ideas have a different emphasis than some work on performance, and I have engaged in vigorous debate with many clients on these points. My experience is that an achievement culture will achieve a consistency of results over a long time frame, as well as high engagement. I am very passionate about achievement, and will happily spend more time on this with you if you contact me directly.